Linking

Oregon's infamous exploding whale incident

Heheh.

The world's shortest Peak Oil article

The world's shortest Peak Oil article
Jeffrey J. Brown, EnergyBulletin
Three points:

(1) Mathematically, based on the Hubbert Linearization method, the world is now where the Lower 48 and the North Sea peaked and declined (all crude + condensate).

(2) Through July, 2006 (based on EIA Data), the world has produced about 142 million barrels less oil than if we had simply maintained the 12/05 production rate. This is a shortfall of about 675,000 bpd. During this time period, oil prices traded in the highest (nominal) price range in history.

(3) We are virtually certain that all four oil fields currently producing one mbpd or more are in decline (we are certain that three of the four are in decline).

Underestimating Demand, Overestimating Supply

http://www.energybulletin.net/20094.html

Commentary: Underestimating Demand, Overestimating Supply

by Matthew Simmons


At the end of August each year, the IEA updates the past 15 years’ reports with all the latest revisions. I have not had time to check and see how big any revisions have been. What did strike me are the ongoing changes in both demand (which has always been viewed with a great deal of skepticism, that further growth of any magnitude was unlikely) and Non-OPEC supply which has been projected to surge beginning in the 4th quarter of the coming year for the past 15 years.


In retrospect, the best way to review key fundamentals is to look carefully at changes in global supply and demand, and where they’ve come from. Between 1991 and 2005, global demand for oil grew by 16.6 million b/d. More astonishing is that non-FSU demand grew from 58.9 million b/d in 1991 to 79.8 million barrels a day in 2005. In other words, outside the unanticipated collapse of the Former Soviet Union, the rest of the world's oil demand grew by 20.9 million barrels a day in just 14 years (35%; 2.5% per year) vs. the projection by many oil pundits that oil demand growth was certainly slowing down.

In the meantime, non-OPEC oil supply, outside the FSU, grew in that same 14 years, but only by a modest 6.7 million b/d, from 31 to million b/d to 37.7 million b/d. That’s less than 0.5 mbd per year. Too many important regions peaked and went into decline. Had the FSU not been able to grow from 10.4 million to 11.6 million b/d and OPEC grown from 25.6 million to 34.2 million b/d, the world economy would likely have been in very hot water.

Looking forward, if FSU growth is modest and OPEC growth only happens in a handful of countries, and is offset by declines—in Indonesia, Venezuela, possibly Nigeria, Iraq, possibly Iran and perhaps Saudi Arabia—it will be impossible to tolerate any sizable jumps in demand, and certainly nothing of the magnitude that has happened over the past 14 years.

The world of oil turned out very different from what the experts at EIA, IEA, CERA, BP, EXXON and others all thought. All one needed to do to spot these major trends in the past is do a modest amount of homework, evaluating the numbers to spot key trends.

All this would be academic to the world had it not been dealing with oil, the world's most critical and largest energy resource. How we blew the future will be the topic of many books over the next decades!

Matt Simmons is Chairman of Simmons & Co. International, an independent investment bank specializing in the energy industry.

Of Mites and Men: that buzzing sound may be a metaphor looking for a place to land.

http://www.orionmagazine.org/pages/om/06-4om/McKibben.html  

Small Change

 - by Bill McKibben

Of Mites and Men: that buzzing sound may be a metaphor looking for a place to land. 

A few notes about honeybees, for a lazy summer day with a low, humming buzz coming from the direction of the squash patch: Under ideal conditions, a single colony can produce two hundred pounds of surplus honey a year, the product of visits to as many as 500 million flowers.

Honey is their fuel—a bee gets about 7 million flight miles to the gallon.

Tequila - Leave Shyness Behind

Do you have feelings of inadequacy?  Do you suffer from shyness?  Do you sometimes wish you were more assertive?  If you answered yes to any of these questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist about Tequila®

Tequila® is the safe, natural way to feel better and more confident  about yourself and your actions. Tequila® can help ease you out of your shyness and let you tell the world that you're ready and willing to do just about anything. You will notice the benefits of Tequila® almost immediately, and with a regimen of regular doses you can overcome any obstacles that prevent you from living the life you want to live.  Shyness and awkwardness will be a thing of the past, and you will discover many talents you never knew you had. Stop hiding and start living, with Tequila®.

Tequila® may not be right for everyone. Women who are pregnant or nursing should not use Tequila®. However, women who wouldn't mind nursing or becoming pregnant are encouraged to try it. Side effects may include dizziness, nausea, vomiting, incarceration, erotic lustfulness, loss of motor control, loss of clothing, loss of money, loss of virginity, delusions of grandeur, table dancing, headache, dehydration, dry mouth, and a desire to sing Karaoke and play all-night rounds of Strip Poker, Truth Or Dare, and Naked Twister. Tequila®. Leave Shyness Behind.(tm)

Syndicate content